QUOTE (X-Offender @ Jan 17 2015, 10:28 PM)

Yes, because one signing is enough to "change the paradigm". Don't get me wrong, it is an investment for the future if taken per se, but such investments are made by following a specific plan, which we do not have. We saw his was free, made an offer and took him. Just like we did with Essien, Torres, Lopez, Alex, not exactly "promising youngsters".
If you wanna talk about investments, then consider Saponara, who was taken with a clear goal in mind, yet we just loaned him out. Same story with the various Grimi, Cardacio, Viudez, Mattioni, Didac Vilà etc. All our "real" investments turn out crap because we sign players because they're cheap or free, not because we follow them to decide whether they're worth it and whether they suit our plans. It's plain as day. A few isolated examples like Kaká, Pato and El Shaarawy don't prove anything.
I must say, I don't get this discussion. Lopez and Alex may be old, but they are very needed and valuable. Torres was a miscalculation, with Essien you're spot on. The thing is, Suso is young and talented. I really don't think Milan only signed him because he's free, like you implied, because there's lots of free or almost free young players as well on the market.
Secondly, we can always hope for a change of paradigm. Why should we now moan and act negative?
I don't agree with your analysis. We didn't sign Saponara because he was cheap, we signed him because we expected much of him, but he never materialized the potential. Cardacio, Viudez, Grimi were all filler players. Agreed, it was the wrong strategy, but we never signed them with a serious wish to develop or even play these players.
All in all, Suso could be a good signing. Whining around and listing past failures has not much point IMO.