QUOTE (Fillipo Simone @ Sep 12 2010, 11:18 PM)

You keep bringing up does mistakes, while I honestly mean Istambul was pure luck.
On the other hand, we keep mentioning Capello and Sacchi, but can we compare those two time periods? Honestly? Champions Cup and Champions League makes a hell of a difference. In Capello/Sacchi days Milan had usually a easy start with teams like Ljubljana or HJK from Finland to deal, while tuff opposition occured only in quater finals and the semis. It was way easier to get to the final, then in the complicated Champions League system, espcially in the pre-Platini era with two group stages.
IMO it says very little and masks the reality. It's like saying - Capello managed to finish 11th with Milan, while the next season Tabarez and Morini did better end the next one Zaccheroni got us the scudetto - does it say a lot?
Honestly, can't we agree that Leonardo was a rookie coach who marked one of Milan's biggest defeats against Inter in history? Can someone like the guy or rate him after such a debacle?
Some said that the team was celebrating during half time that night. That's bringing on trouble imo, the match isn't over until the ref blows his whistle. Sure they were lucky but imo Milan played into it big time. And Carlo shouldn't have condoned such an attitude when he should know better
You can only beat what is in front of you, alot of people talk about our 07 win as something that was thanks to the poor opposition we faced until we met Man U who had a decimated defence.
The point still stand with a stronger team Carlo couldn't even make the CL spots, while Leo at least managed 3rd. After losing Kaka and Paolo. And we had some bad losses under Carlo against Inter as well so... My point here is, that without a top class team Carlo cannot manage anything. Look at him winning in England, he has the best team in the country imo, while Man U lost a lot of strength when they sold C.Ron, someone who used to score over 30 goals a season.
QUOTE (Rossoneri7 @ Sep 12 2010, 11:26 PM)

han, Carlo is not an ok coach .. Name one coach post Sacchi & Capello's first stints, that hauled in 8 trophies at their time with Milan.
la merda and Juve don't come close to Milan's record in that competition when Carlo was coach. Agree Juve had a remarkable squad, while la merda had a great XI, but neither of them showed what Milan under Carlo showed in that competition.
Leo had as much chance of winning the Scudetto as Roma did twice post 2006; zero chance.
Like kurt said, he only managed 3 major triophies, who really cares about the others aside from the management, who like to put BS statements under the team crest...
Like I said before, I think Carlo was a genius when it came to KO rounds, but Inter and Juve in the time were Milan were really strong in the competition weren't as weak as you're making them out to be. The only time Milan really 'flew the flag' was in 07 when Inter got KO'd early and Juve were out completely due to playing in Serie B
I wasn't talking about him winning the Scudetto, I was talking about doing better in a season then Carlo with a much weaker team.
QUOTE (kurtsimonw @ Sep 12 2010, 11:38 PM)

8 trophies in 8 years, but only 3 major trophies. The World Club Cup, European Super Cup and Italian Super Cup are glorified friendlies. I see Jose get alot of criticism on the board and if I were to claim he'd won 17 trophies in the past 8 years(which also includes an 8 month period where he wasn't managing), some on here would go on about how some 'dont count' or whatever.
If 8 in 8 years is great, then 17 in 8 years is, well, Special.
I'm no Mourinho fan but I agree with you completely